Xia’s case is part of a wider clampdown on free-thinking intellectuals. In December, Zhang Xuezhong, a legal scholar, was dismissed from the East China University of Political Science and Law in Shanghai after he published a series of articles defending provisions of China’s constitution. State media called such views a Western plot to overthrow the party. Also in December, Chen Hongguo, an academic at the Northwest University of Politics and Law in Xi’an, resigned. The university had objected, among other things, to his holding salons that discussed texts by Western philosophers such as John Stuart Mill.
China’s continued modernisation has meant that students are more open to Western influences and have more social and economic freedoms than ever before. They tweet, blog and talk freely about all but the most sensitive topics. This has made the clampdown on their teachers even more jarring. The ruling Communist Party, worried that it is losing control, has issued a number of political directives banning liberal topics in the classroom. “Since Xi Jinping came into power (as party chief), he has tried to control everything, learning the means from Mao Zedong,” says Xia. “It is a great regression.”
The crackdown has also been aimed at activists among ethnic minorities. Ilham Tohti, an economist at the Central University for Nationalities in Beijing, was detained on January 15. Tohti is a member of the ethnic Uighur minority, a Muslim group in China’s north-west, many of whom believe their land has been occupied by the Chinese. He is accused of spreading separatist thought and inciting ethnic hatred. He says he had only advocated human and legal rights and equality for Uighurs.
Zhang, the legal scholar, sees his own dismissal as a scare tactic that will fail in the long term as the dissonance between politics and everyday life grows. “When there are many people who are… waiting to stand up, crackdown measures will only make people angry,” he says. That may be so, but for now, on the surface at least, the party appears to be in control
(Excerpted and adapted from The Economist)