China: Chinese varsities top BRICS table

China boasts more top universities than any other emerging economy, according to a ranking that looks beyond the usual suspects in global higher education league tables. The inaugural Times Higher Education BRICS & Emerging Economies Rankings consider universities in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, as well as 17 other œemerging economies. Peking University tops the table, with Tsinghua University  (based in Beijing) second. Four of the top 10 and 23 of the top 100 institutions are Chinese. The next best represented countries are Taiwan (21), India (10), Turkey (seven), then South Africa and Thailand (five each). According to Ziming Cai, lecturer in human resource management at the University of Nottingham, Chinese universities have enjoyed œhuge financial investment over the past three decades. Special funding was set aside to propel 39 of its universities to œtop-tier global status, he says. The government also encouraged Chinese universities to open up to the rest of the world by establishing joint programmes with Western institutions and by pushing academics to publish in international journals. According to Simon Marginson, professor of international higher education at the Institute of Education, University of London, Chinese universities are œpretty strong and growing stronger. There were œvery few countries with a per capita gross domestic product below $15,000 (Rs.9.3 lakh) which have done well in global rankings, but China is an œinteresting exception. In comparison, œIndia hasn™t had 15 years of constant funding, nor has it benchmarked itself against other countries. This despite some of its metropolitan universities having been established 150 years ago. Russia has only two representatives in the table, fewer than the former Soviet satellite states Poland (four) and the Czech Republic (three). œRussia is in the doldrums, says Marginson, who argues that its system is œinward-looking and hampered by the fact that publishing in Russian makes it difficult to disseminate its research worldwide. Although they were considered in the analysis, no universities from Indonesia, Pakistan, Peru or the Philippines have made the table, which uses the same methodology as the THE World University Rankings 2013-14. Factors considered include scholarly citations, research income and the proportion of foreign students. The 22 countries analysed are those defined as emerging markets by the FTSE (Financial Times and Stock Exchange) group™s country classification. (Excerpted and adapted from Times Higher Education) Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp