Sweden: Popular free-market schooling revolution

EducationWorld August 08 | EducationWorld

Big-state, social-democratic Sweden seems an odd place to look for a free-market revolution. Yet that is what is under way in the countrys schools. Reforms that came into force in 1994 allow pretty much anyone who satisfies basic standards to open a new school and take in children at the states expense. The local municipality must pay the school what it would have spent educating each child itself — a handsome sum of 48,000-70,000 kronor (Rs.3.45-5.04 lakh) per year, depending on the childs age and the schools location. Children must be admitted on a first-come, first-served basis — there must be no religious requirements or entrance exams. Nothing extra can be charged for, but making a profit is fine.The reforms were controversial, especially within the Social Democratic Party, then in one of its rare spells in opposition. They would have been even more controversial had it been realised just how popular they would prove. In just 14 years the share of Swedish children educated privately has risen from a fraction of a percent to more than 10 percent.
At the time, it was assumed that most ‘free schools would be foreign-language (English, Finnish or Estonian) or religious, or perhaps run by groups of parents in rural areas clubbing together to keep a local school alive. What no one predicted was the emergence of chains of schools. Yet that is where much of the growth in independent education has come from. Swedens Independent Schools Association has ten members that run more than six schools, and five that run ten or more.
The biggest, Kunskapsskolan (‘Knowledge Schools) opened its first six schools in 2000. Four more opened last autumn, bringing the total to 30. It now has 700 employees and teaches nearly 10,000 pupils, with an operating profit of 62 million kronor last year on a turnover of 655 million kronor (Rs.4,716 crore).
Like IKEA, a giant Swedish furniture maker, Kunskapsskolan gets its customers to do much of the work themselves. The vital tool, though is not an Allen key but the Kunskapsporten (‘knowledge portal), a website containing the entire syllabus. Youngsters spend 15 minutes each week with a tutor, reviewing the past weeks progress and agreeing on goals and a timetable for the next one. This will include classes and lectures but also a great deal of independent or small-group study. The Kunskapsporten allows each student to work at his own level, and spend less or more time on each subject, depending on his strengths and weakness. Each subject is divided into 35 steps. Students who reach step 25 graduate with a pass; those who make it to step 30 or 35 gain, respectively, a merit or distinction.
Again like IKEA, no money is wasted on fancy surroundings. Kunskapsskolan Enskede, a school for 11-16-year-olds in a suburb of Stockholm, is a former office block into which classrooms, open-study spaces and two small lecture-theatres have been squeezed. It is pleasant, but basic and rather bare. It rents fields nearby for football and basketball and like other schools in the chain, sends pupils away to one of two specially built facilities for a week each term for home economics, woodwork and art, rather than providing costly, little-used facilities in the school.
Teachers update and add new material to the website during school holidays and get just seven weeks off each year, roughly the same as the average Swedish office worker. We dont want teachers preparing lessons during term-time, says Per Ledin, the companys boss. Instead we steal that preparation time, and use it so they can spend more time with students.
Many schools would be horrified to be likened to IKEA but Ledin goes one better. We do not mind being compared to McDonalds, he says. If were religious about anything, its standardisation. We tell our teachers it is more important to do things the same way than to do them well. He then broadens the analogy to hotels and airlines, which make money only if they are popular enough to maintain high occupancy rates.
Schooling is, in one respect, a very safe business: parents will always want their children educated and future demand is relatively easy to predict. So unsurprisingly the returns are solid, rather than stellar: Ledin quotes an average return on capital of 5-7 percent a year. But like any business with a single customer, there are risks, too — and when that customer is the state, the biggest ones are political. If a future government, hostile to school choice, changes the rules, that would be the end of this nascent market.
(Excerpted and adapted from The Economist)

Current Issue
EducationWorld January 2023
ParentsWorld January 2023

WordPress Lightbox Plugin