Maharashtra: Student reached Ukraine varsity campus minutes before war began

Ending Russia-Ukraine war: A solution

March 15, 2022
-Dilip ThakoreDilip Thakore

Russia’s invasion of the independent Republic Ukraine on February 25 and the substantial damage to lives and property that the inconclusive 21- day war has caused in the heavily outgunned and outnumbered latter country, have been universally condemned. Rightly so because Russia and particularly its autocratic President Vladimir Putin mounted the largest land offensive since World War II against its hapless neighbour nation without sufficiently arguing his case in the United Nations General Assembly and the world’s community of countries prior to launching the invasion.

For its ‘unprovoked’ invasion of its neighbour republic, the US and the West have imposed unprecedented  economic and financial sanctions against Russia. Its  hard currency reserves with IMF and International Bank of Settlements have been frozen and Russia’s  lucrative crude oil and liquid natural gas supplies to  to Europe have been severely disrupted. These sanctions are likely to  deeply  hurt  the general populace of Russia.

Nevertheless it’ s not  true that Russian aggression against Ukraine was entirely unprovoked. For the past several years,  President  Putin had repeatedly warned Ukraine — which until 1991 had been integrated in Russia’s  precursor United Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) aka, Soviet Union —  against signing up with  NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) an anti-Soviet  coalition  of Western countries established by the United States in 1949  to protect Western European nations against the threat of westward expansion of Russia under the USSR banner. However during the past 30 years after implosion of the USSR in 1991 several former Soviet republics including  Estonia, Latvia, Hungary and Poland which neighbour Russia,  became NATO member nations. Evidently imminent NATO membership of Ukraine which for several centuries was a constituent unit of Russia, was the last straw for President Putin. As he observed in a video which has mysteriously disappeared from social media, how would the US react if Russian troops and missiles were sited on the Canada-US or Mexico-US border?  

The answer is provided by America’s Monroe Doctrine (1823) which states that stationing of  any troops or armaments by any European or other nation on the soil of any country in the North and South American continents is an act of war against the US. It pertinent to recall  that in 1962 when the USSR sited its missiles in Cuba, President Kennedy blockaded Soviet warships heading for Cuba and nearly triggered a nuclear war. In the circumstances the continuous expansion of NATO to ring-fence Russia with member nations violates the norms of justice and equity.

The terms and conditions of a durable peace in Eastern Europe are self-evident. The US should unilaterally abrogate all NATO memberships of former USSR republics on condition of their independence and territorial integrity being guaranteed by the United Nations, and Ukraine should withdraw its membership application. This will prompt a face-saving  Russian withdrawal from Ukraine on terms and conditions already conceded by Ukraine’s President Zelensky. Even if not clearly enunciated, President Putin not unjustifiably believes that Russia is entitled to a Monroe doctrine equivalent which prohibits troops and missiles in its neigbourhood and backyard.

Dilip Thakore is former founder editor of Business India and Business World, and currently editor of EducationWorld
Posted in International, News
Current Issue
EducationWorld November 2022
ParentsWorld November 2022

HealthStart
HealthStart
WordPress Lightbox Plugin