Jobs in Education System

Technical capability illusion

EducationWorld May 06 | EducationWorld
A large number of middle class Indians tend to exult in the statistic that the country hosts the world’s third largest technical work force. The fact is we probably have the largest number of plumbers, carpenters, masons, welders, house painters etc. Yet as any home owner will swear, the quality of plumbing, carpentry, masonry or welding services is abysmal. Unfortunately what is true of lower end technical manpower is also true of higher end technical manpower. The half a dozen IITs and a handful of other technical institutions combined constitute a minuscule tip of a massive technical education iceberg submerged in a sea of mediocrity. The plain truth is that the great majority of institutions that pass for contemporary India’s engineering colleges produce graduates who are hardly employable in the domestic market, let alone internationally. Why are the great majority of our technical institutions of higher learning in indifferent health? What policy interventions are required to revitalise them? What are the management challenges in raising the floor level of our technical education? These questions need to be addressed and answered in the public interest. India hosts an estimated 1,300 engineering colleges. Together they graduate 500,000-600,000 engineers every year. The All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) mandates a teacher-pupil ratio of 1:15. This translates into a 33,000-40,000 faculty requirement. If we accept a 5 percent faculty attrition rate conservatively, on an average we need 1,650-2,000 new faculty every year in our engineering colleges. Ideally, if our engineering colleges were truly institutions of higher learning, the new teachers ought to be Ph Ds. But sadly, India produces less than 450 Ph Ds in technology annually. Of these 450 Ph Ds, half are not employable as teachers because of poor communication skills, if not knowledge base. Half of the remaining prefer to go abroad or into industry. Thus, of the 450 Ph Ds produced, the supply available to engineering colleges annually is barely 100-125 against a requirement of around 1,600-2,000! Why is our annual output of Ph Ds so low? Because India has never been a technology research-oriented country. This is evidenced by the fact that even today, much of what passes for ‘innovation’ or ‘research’ in India is little more than recycled versions of research conducted elsewhere in the world. Little wonder that typically higher engineering education (M. Tech and Ph D) has remained a way of postponing unemployment. But over the years, as alternative careers opened up in management, information technology, software, BPO etc, the need for postponement of unemployment has reduced and hence the number of M.Techs and Ph Ds has also dwindled. Today almost every undergraduate engineer, if he/ she is any good, wants immediate employment or enrollment in a B-school. That’s also the reason why even in IITs, one hardly ever finds an IIT graduate working for his or her Masters or doctorate. Most such scholars are from lesser engineering colleges, typically from smaller towns. There are several motivators behind this situation. Unlike technology driven countries such as Germany, Japan,
Already a subscriber
Click here to log in and continue reading by entering your registered email address or subscribe now
Join with us in our mission to build the pressure of public opinion to make education the #1 item on the national agenda
Current Issue
EducationWorld September 2024
ParentsWorld September 2024

Access USA Alliance
Access USA
Xperimentor
WordPress Lightbox Plugin