Jobs in Education System
Side ad-01

Germany: High-profile plagiarism resignations

EducationWorld October 13 | EducationWorld International News
As recent headline-grabbing resignations by two federal government ministers attest, the issue of academic plagiarism is a higher-profile matter in Germany, and with bigger political stakes, than almost anywhere else. Both defence minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, who quit his post in 2011, and Annette Schavan, the minister for education and research who departed from chancellor Angela Merkel’s team in early 2013, were forced out in the wake of claims made by whistleblowers that parts of their doctoral theses had been plagiarised. Unsurprisingly, revelations over these cases and others like them have prompted change in academia — although not necessarily the change you would expect. Responding to urgent calls from the federal government to address the issue, the German Research Foundation (the Deutsche Forschungs-gemeinschaft, or DFG), a major research-funding organisation and the biggest of its kind in Europe, is altering its guidelines on the reporting of plagiarism — to state that universities should no longer investigate allegations solely on the basis of anonymous tip-offs. The implications may be far-reaching, and some experts fear the change will restrict exposure of academic misconduct. Without academic researchers identifying the problematic borrowings, it seems clear that zu Guttenberg would not have (very reluctantly) acknowledged that large parts of his 2006 doctoral thesis in law for the University of Bayreuth in Bavaria were taken from uncredited sources. Bayreuth stripped zu Guttenberg of his Ph D in 2011. Similarly, the rescinding this year of Schavan’s 1980 doctorate from Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf came about because of revelations made via a crowdsourced website, VroniPlag Wiki, which claimed her thesis contained large sections of unoriginal work. But when in August the DFG published revisions to its “academic code of practice”, in response to urgent calls from the federal and regional governments to tackle the situation, its course of action surprised many. “From now on, we will no longer investigate allegations of plagiarism in doctoral theses on the basis of anonymous tips alone,” says Dorothee Dzwonnek, secretary general of DFG. Expanding on this, the DFG stipulates in its revised guidelines that “in future, so-called ‘whistleblowers’ will no longer be able to precipitate official investigations unless they are prepared to let themselves be named”. DFG president Peter Strohschneider says he has reservations about people who make anonymous allegations, especially when complaints become public. He feels it is essential to deter those whistleblowers who, he suggests, act out of spiteful motives, purely to harm colleagues’ reputations. Dzwonnek agrees that the DFG must ensure first and foremost that all anonymous complaints are being made by people “acting in good faith”. In the meantime, the cases of zu Guttenberg and Schavan are only the most high-profile instances of suspect doctoral qualifications brought to light via online scrutiny. VroniPlag Wiki is the successor of an earlier site, GuttenPlag Wiki, which aired many allegations against zu Guttenberg. A crowdsourced resource which examines the extent of plagiarism in German doctoral theses, it includes academics among its contributors. Some contributors are anonymous (such as the user who
Already a subscriber
Click here to log in and continue reading by entering your registered email address or subscribe now
Join with us in our mission to build the pressure of public opinion to make education the #1 item on the national agenda
Current Issue
EducationWorld September 2024
ParentsWorld September 2024

Access USA Alliance
Access USA
Xperimentor
WordPress Lightbox Plugin