-Summiya Yasmeen (Bengaluru) Best-selling author, motivational speaker, and self-improvement guru, SEAN COVEY is the Utah (USA)-based president of FranklinCovey Education, a division of FranklinCovey Inc (FCI, annual revenue: $263 million (Rs.2,177 crore) in 2021-22), a publicly-listed company providing assessment training and services in leadership and business management to corporates and individuals. The progeny of management guru Stephen R. Covey (1932-2012), author of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People which has sold a record 40 million copies and counting worldwide, Sean in his own right has designed FCI’s unique Leader in Me (LiM) programme — “an evidence-based, comprehensive model that builds leadership and life skills in students” — for K-12 schools. Currently, the LiM programme is being taught in 6,500 schools in 50 countries worldwide. In India, the programme is promoted by its exclusive India partner Live Life Education Pvt. Ltd, founded by well-known Chennai-based psychiatrist DR. KANNAN GIREESH. Presently, over 100 schools countrywide are offering the LiM programme. Newspeg. Sean Covey was in India in early December on a whirlwind five-city tour of Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Mumbai and Bhubaneswar for the Leader in Me Connect Conclave organised by Live Life Education. The multi-city conclave drew participation of over 1,000 school promoters, principals and teachers. History. An alumnus of Brigham Young University and Harvard Business School, Sean began his career in Walt Disney Inc followed by stints at consulting firms Deloitte and Touche, Boston, and Trammel Crow Ventures, Dallas. In 1994, he signed up with the Covey Leadership Center founded by his sire, which merged with Hyrum W. Smith’s Franklin Quest in 1997 to morph into FCI. That very year, Sean published his first book The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Teens, which has sold over 4 million copies worldwide. Since then, he has authored several books including The 6 Most Important Decisions You’ll Ever Make (2006) and The 7 Habits of Happy Kids (2008). According to Covey, the genesis of LiM can be traced to 1999 when A.B. Combs Elementary, North Carolina began implementing the elder Covey’s 7 Habits in its school. Subsequently, principal Muriel Summers recorded its success in transforming the institution. In 2005, Sean Covey visited A.B. Combs and witnessed a miraculous transformation of the school where students and teachers were practicing Covey Sr’s 7 Habits — be proactive, begin with the end in mind, put first things first, think win/win, seek to first understand, then to be understood, synergise and sharpen the saw. “That’s when it struck me that the 7 Habits can be adapted to enable whole school improvement. In 2008 after extensive research, I designed the Leader in Me programme,” recalls Sean Covey. Schools which sign up for LiM receive textbooks and access to an online repository of resources with teachers trained extensively to implement the programme. In India, the whole-school programme is priced at Rs.850-950 per student per year. Direct talk. “In less than 15 years since LiM was launched, it has evolved into the most influential whole school improvement programme worldwide with…
Already a subscriber
Click here to
log in and continue reading by entering your registered email address or
subscribe now
Join with us in our mission to build the pressure of public opinion to make education the #1 item on the national agenda
Settle Sino-India border through compromise
Can one-sided claims or a ‘no-compromise’ stance by either India or China guarantee peace along the LAC, much less cooperation between our two civilizational nations that can shape a new world order?, writes Sudheendra Kulkarni JUNE 2020: GALWAN VALLEY, LADAKH. DECEMBER 2022: Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh. In the absence of a mutually agreed permanent boundary, every time there is a military clash at any point along the 3,488-km-long Line of Actual Control (LAC), between India and China, the trust deficit between our two countries grows wider. The media and social media in both countries exacerbate hostility between the world’s most populous countries. Opposition parties in India train their guns on government. This does not happen in China because it doesn’t have opposition parties. Yet each time there’s a confrontation on the LAC and soldiers are killed or injured, the same two questions repeat themselves in the minds of those who want peace and cooperation between Asia’s biggest countries which co-existed in peace and harmony for 2000 years before the 1962 border war in the north-east. How long will this confrontation go on? And can the boundary dispute be settled once and for all? The second question can be answered easily. And if the second question is answered to the satisfaction of both countries, the first becomes redundant. The best opportunity to settle the dispute — in the western sector (Ladakh) and in the east (Arunachal Pradesh, formerly known as North-East Frontier Agency or NEFA) — came in 1960. China offered a workable solution, but India rejected the offer and lost a historic opportunity. Then prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru’s weakness, vacillation and lack of foresight were to blame, but also the sustained pressure of opposition parties on the prime minister to make “no compromises” relating to territory claimed by India. This resulted in the Indo-China border war of 1962. India’s defeat in that war has left such a deep psychological scar that neither politicians nor people of India are prepared to view the boundary dispute objectively. But it’s important to state facts clearly and dispassionately. In 1960, at Nehru’s invitation, China’s premier Zhou Enlai visited India. “I have come here to seek a solution and not to repeat arguments,” he said. At that time Zhou offered a ‘package deal’ for final settlement of the boundary issue. China would accept India’s sovereignty over NEFA, which meant de jure recognition of the McMahon Line, if India accepted China’s lines drawn in Aksai Chin, Ladakh. China has always challenged the McMahon Line as illegal, because it was arbitrarily drawn by British imperialists when neither China nor India was free. Nevertheless, Zhou, obviously with the approval of Chairman Mao Zedong, agreed to accept the McMahon Line and thereby India’s claim on NEFA. “Our friendship is the most important thing,” he told R.K. Nehru, former India ambassador to China. “Non-settlement of this problem will harm us both.” Zhou spent 20 hours in talks with Nehru. But the latter rejected the package deal because opposition leaders (including Atal…