With an estimated 32 percent of the country’s students in higher education enrolled in government universities, the annual EW India Higher Education Rankings 2020-21 has introduced separate league tables rating the country’s 150 most reputed government universities – Summiya Yasmeen Although since the dawn of the new millennium when several state governments began liberally legislating promotion of private universities, the country’s 513 publicly-funded government universities have lost their sheen, they still dominate India’s higher education system. According to the Delhi-based University Grants Commission (UGC) data (2020), currently 409 state and 50 Central government, 127 deemed (government and private) and 349 private varsities are providing higher education countrywide. Within the public higher education system, the 50 Central universities (budget: Rs.7,463.26 crore in 2020-21) and deemed universities are top of the tree followed by 409 state government varsities. Once reputed for their high academic quality and excellent faculty, the majority of India’s 409 state universities are in a shambles ruined by meddling rustic politicians, over-the-top caste-based selection of faculty and students, and over-subsidisation of tuition fees. Yet, since an estimated 32 percent of the country’s 37.4 million students in higher education are enrolled in government universities, this year the annual EducationWorld India Higher Education Rankings 2020-21, which hitherto ranked private universities, has introduced separate league tables rating the country’s 150 most reputed government varsities under ten parameters of higher education excellence and ranks them inter se. To conduct the EW India Government University Rankings 2020-21, over 150 field personnel of the highlyreputed Delhi-based market research and opinion polls company, Centre for Forecasting & Research Pvt. Ltd (C fore), interviewed 4,168 sample respondents comprising 2,214 faculty and 1,126 final year students of 162 universities, and 828 industry representatives in 25 cities countrywide. They were persuaded to award public universities they are familiar with, scores of 1-300 on ten parameters of higher education excellence, viz, faculty competence, faculty welfare & development, research and innovation, curriculum and pedagogy, industry interface, placements, infrastructure, internationalism, leadership/governance and range and diversity of study programmes offered. Higher weightage is given to the critical parameters of faculty competence (150), research and innovation (300) and infrastructure (150). “This year’s rankings league table is based on a mix of factual objective criteria and perceptions of knowledgeable sample respondents. Objective data has been culled from papers published by faculty in refereed journals and number of citations was obtained from secondary sources including the Scopus index. Twenty percent weightage is given to publications and citations in refereed journals worldwide,” says Premchand Palety, founder- CEO of C fore. Unsurprisingly, the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore (IISc, estb.1909) is ranked the country’s #1 higher education institution in the EW Government University Rankings 2020-21, with top scores under seven of the ten parameters of higher education excellence including research and innovation, given highest weightage (300), in the survey. Promoted in 1909 through a generous land grant from pioneer industrialist J.N. Tata who founded the Mumbai-based Tata business empire, IISc with an enrolment of 4,200 students, including 2,750 doctoral students, mentored by 500…
Already a subscriber
Click here to
log in and continue reading by entering your registered email address or
subscribe now
Join with us in our mission to build the pressure of public opinion to make education the #1 item on the national agenda
Society needs moral repair & healing
The enormity of the corona pandemic crisis demands that we rise above current stereotypes and perceptions. This transformation has to occur in two forms. We have to acknowledge that the Corona crisis has unearthed much deeper and fundamental problems. The first is a crisis of imagination and cerebration. The stereotypes used to evaluate the crisis at the policy level have become obvious and predictable. It highlights the need to view India as a knowledge society and make experiments in pedagogy part of the democratic and cognitive imagination. A philosopher friend of mine suggested three examples, beginning with something playful. We need a graphic novel of the epidemic to help us visualise key moments of decision making. Second, we need to make future studies a part of everyday pedagogies. Futures, as cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead and peace research scientist Johan Galtung have suggested, should be taught in schools, so that scenario building gaming exercises, heuristics and systems connectivity become intrinsic to the way in which all students learn. My friend added that we also need to rethink the city as a continuous learning system, the way Patrick Geddes and other sociologists have suggested. We have to rethink the city with every catastrophe. Our incumbent politicians and policy wonks seem to have forgotten the migrant and informal economy, with devastating consequences. They have to go beyond poverty to understand vulnerability. Indian society owes an apology to our migrants if it has to recover as a democratic imagination. Moreover, there’s need to look beyond society and the city as learning organisations, at questions of time and memory. Within a few weeks after a crisis, society goes back to old ways and habits. We will pretend the Corona crisis never happened. The need is not for monuments or memorials. It’s for feedback of mnemonics so that we can start correcting errors. Such transformation requires a new idea of economics. It is time to disembed economies the way anthropologist Karl Polayni suggested: disaggregate the formal economy into sub-sets such as the informal, tribal and crafts economies and use systems theory to create differing connectivities between parts and whole. The deficiency of latter day economics is that the whole is less than the sum of its parts. The pandemic has demanded that people learn to work at home. But no one except architect Gautam Bhatia has suggested differentiation between house and home, between a residence and productivity and conviviality of the family that stays within. As many anthropologists have suggested, there’s need to venture beyond the linearity of timetables. Progressive societies have to be open to the idea of multiple life cycles to avoid confusing old age with obsolescence. Both healthcare and democracy need revolutions in philosophy and the social sciences. The tragedy is general acceptance that all that a crisis demands is a return to normalcy, when the old normalcy won’t be available. The silver lining of the Coronavirus pandemic and the prolonged national lockdown, is rising awareness that Indian democracy has to go beyond the…