To compile the EW India Private Engineering Colleges Rankings 2020-21, 150 field representatives of the Delhi-based Centre for Forecasting and Research Pvt. Ltd interviewed 1,063 faculty, 1,368 final year engineering students and 423 industry representatives countrywide – Summiya Yasmeen Engineering education in India is facing an unprecedented over-supply and graduate unemployability crisis. During the past five years, enrolments in the country’s 3,415 engineering institutions have nose-dived. In 2019, 50 percent of capacity in BE/B.Tech/M. Tech degree programmes countrywide was unutilised, and a mere 600,000 of the 1.5 million engineering students who graduated last year were campus recruited. Following this sharpest five-year fall in enrolments and 60 percent graduate unemployability, last year the Delhi-based All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) — the apex regulatory body for technical education — constituted a special committee under the leadership of Dr. B.V.R. Reddy, chairman of IIT-Hyderabad, to suggest ways and means to reform and revive engineering education in India. Identifying “low enrolment, lower placements and low employability” as the causes of this malaise, the Reddy Committee recommends that AICTE should not licence any new engineering colleges until 2022 and encourage ene gineering colleges to diversify from traditional disciplines such as electrical, mechanical, civil engineering to provide study programmes in new technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics, quantum computing, data sciences etc. Moreover, it called for eliminating faculty shortages and promoting greater academia-industry cooperation. Accepting the committee’s recommendations to freeze capacity with alacrity, in early February AICTE banned promotion of greenfield engineering colleges for two years. Against this gloomy backdrop, EducationWorld presents its EducationWorld India Private Engineering Institutes Rankings 2020-21 to enable higher secondary school leavers with engineering on their minds to pick and choose the most aptitudinally suitable private colleges for undergrad education. Since 2016, EducationWorld has been excluding the heavily subsidised and routinely top-ranked Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) and National Institutes of Technology (NITs), preferring to evaluate and rank the country’s Top 100 private engineering colleges to enable the 98 percent of students who don’t make it into the top 2 percent of the 1.14 million school-leavers who write the IIT/NIT Joint Entrance Exam annually, to choose the most suitable among private institutions, some of which are rapidly closing the IITs/NITs versus the rest gap. To compile the EW India Private Engineering Institutes Rankings (EWIPEIR) 2020-21, 150 field representatives of the Delhi-based Centre for Forecasting and Research Pvt. Ltd (C fore, estb.2000), the country’s premier market research and opinion polls company (which also conducts the annual EducationWorld India School Rankings (estb.2007) and EW India Preschool Rankings (2010)), interviewed 1,063 faculty, 1,368 final year engineering students and 423 industry representatives countrywide. These sample respondents were persuaded to rate engineering institutes (of whom they had sufficient knowledge) on nine parameters of excellence, viz, faculty competence, placement, research and innovation, curriculum and pedagogy, industry interface, value for money, infrastructure, faculty welfare, leadership and governance. The scores awarded by respondents under each parameter were totaled to rank the country’s Top 100 private engineering colleges/institutes inter se.…
Already a subscriber
Click here to
log in and continue reading by entering your registered email address or
subscribe now
Join with us in our mission to build the pressure of public opinion to make education the #1 item on the national agenda
Making NIRF more credible
Dr. R. Natarajan is former director of IIT-Madras and former chairman of All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) In mid-February China’s ministries of education and science and technology jointly issued a notification to reform the academic evaluation system to reduce “excessive reliance on the Science Citation and Social Science Citation indices” as key indicators for “academic promotions, job offers and allocation of research funding”. This radical initiative is backed by the finance ministry, which funds research in national universities. Moving away from international research publications was first announced by President Xi Ping during a national education conference in September 2018. Xi observed that “academic standards in higher education institutions should not be led by Western ideas or standards, and stressed that China should have its own academic standards and norms, not bound by international norms,” reports the London-based University World News (March 4). Dr. Futao Huang, professor of higher education at Hiroshima University, Japan, who has been studying the research culture of young academics in China, says that the shift of emphasis from international publication will translate into huge changes for China’s research evaluation system. He predicts that the status of several Chinese universities in major global university rankings will decline as a result of reduction in SCI publications from Chinese university researchers. That’s because in recent years Chinese scholars are second worldwide for the number of research papers published in international journals, behind only the US. Under the notification, while hard sciences will continue to be subject to international peer reviews and publication in international journals, in soft sciences, such as the humanities and social sciences, profound changes can be expected inasmuch as they have less international linkages and networks and conduct less international collaborative activities. In addition, as Prof. Huang highlights, English is not the language for soft sciences as it is for the hard sciences. It’s well-known that the major global university rankings — QS and Times Higher Education — are heavily influenced by research output and citations in peer reviewed journals published in English. This has a direct bearing on university rankings, and automatically favours Western and AngloAmerican universities which routinely top the QS and THE World University Rankings (WURs) league tables. Higher education institutions in non-English speaking countries of Europe (excluding the UK), Latin America, etc, suffer low rank as a result. However, this doesn’t apply to India where higher education is mostly in English. The plain truth is that research is given too little importance in this country’s 993 universities. Instead of addressing this lacuna, the common complaint against established WURs is that social equity issues such as reservation for the under-privileged and backward classes are not given any importance in them. The Indian response to the QS and THE WURs is the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) of the Union human resource development (HRD) ministry. In the annual NIRF, the country’s Top 100 universities, arts, science, commerce colleges, engineering colleges and other professional institutions are evaluated under several parameters including resources, research and stakeholder perceptions which are assigned differing weightage and ranked inter se. About 3,500 institutions have…